CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

Services
Capture
Managed Detection & Response

Eliminate active threats with 24/7 threat detection, investigation, and response.

twi-managed-portal-color
Co-Managed SOC (SIEM)

Maximize your SIEM investment, stop alert fatigue, and enhance your team with hybrid security operations support.

twi-briefcase-color-svg
Advisory & Diagnostics

Advance your cybersecurity program and get expert guidance where you need it most.

tw-laptop-data
Penetration Testing

Test your physical locations and IT infrastructure to shore up weaknesses before exploitation.

twi-database-color-svg
Database Security

Prevent unauthorized access and exceed compliance requirements.

twi-email-color-svg
Email Security

Stop email threats others miss and secure your organization against the #1 ransomware attack vector.

tw-officer
Digital Forensics & Incident Response

Prepare for the inevitable with 24/7 global breach response in-region and available on-site.

tw-network
Firewall & Technology Management

Mitigate risk of a cyberattack with 24/7 incident and health monitoring and the latest threat intelligence.

Solutions
BY TOPIC
Offensive Security
Solutions to maximize your security ROI
Microsoft Exchange Server Attacks
Stay protected against emerging threats
Rapidly Secure New Environments
Security for rapid response situations
Securing the Cloud
Safely navigate and stay protected
Securing the IoT Landscape
Test, monitor and secure network objects
Why Trustwave
About Us
Awards and Accolades
Trustwave SpiderLabs Team
Trustwave Fusion Security Operations Platform
Trustwave Security Colony
Partners
Technology Alliance Partners
Key alliances who align and support our ecosystem of security offerings
Trustwave PartnerOne Program
Join forces with Trustwave to protect against the most advance cybersecurity threats
SpiderLabs Blog

ModBus 101: One Protocol to Rule the OT World

Ever wondered how large-scale power plants monitor or control the myriad of systems that fill their environment? Have you thought about how some of the world’s greatest industrial hacks were enacted?

This post will look to illuminate how one tiny legacy protocol, namely "ModBus" could help to understand just how straight forward this could be. To gain a more in-depth understanding we will be pulling apart the following things:

  • ICS: Industrial Control Systems
  • OT: What is Operational Technology
  • Modbus: What it is and how is the protocol is structured ?
  • The Exploits: How such a protocol is susceptible to attack

 

ICS: Industrial Control Systems

A "control system" can be defined as a system that manages, commands, directs, or regulates the behavior of other systems.

An "Industrial Control System" is simply the generic term that describes a group of integrated control systems which are used to control instrumentation within an industrial environment. These types of systems may be made up of Relays, which could be used to control attached components or, the monitoring of various sources such as water pressure gauges for example.

In common parlance, an ICS can be compared to a symphony conductor. It’s system that directs and controls all the sub-systems resulting in a smooth-running operation.

 

OT: What is Operational Technology and its components ?

"Operation Technology" is the term used to describe the hardware and software used to detect or cause a change to a component of a "Industrial Control System". A common way to control such components is using a "PLC (Programmable Logic Controller)", which is simply a Microprocessor-based controller that can be used to bridge the gap between the analog world (a physical relay that controls a light) and the digital world (a network interface that allows individual PLC's to be interconnected for management and control purposes). 

Specific protocols have been developed to control these interconnected PLC's. One of which, named ModBus has become the de-facto open standard commonly used to connect diverse ICSs over an Ethernet structure.

 

What is Modbus and How is the Protocol Structured?

Modbus has been around for many years. It was initially developed in 1968 and released into the market in 1979 by Modicon, now Schneider Electric, as a protocol designed to replace hard-wired relay systems.

Modbus is now an open standard and a widely used communications protocol that allows for the monitoring and controlling of individual PLCs within an ICS.

 

How does ModBus work?

ModBus has become the de facto standard, truly open and the most widely used network protocol in the industrial manufacturing environment. It has been implemented by hundreds of vendors on thousands of different devices to transfer discrete/analog I/O and register data between control devices. It is a lingua franca of common denominator between different manufacturers.

The ModBus protocol functions as a method to share messages amongst a group of interconnected devices. This messaging mechanism is used by each device to share information amongst one another, typically over a common physical medium type. The common physical medium type in use may vary across the industry. The choice of common medium type is commonly dependent on the type of device in use, that is to say not all devices share a standard physical interconnection type and thus ModBus provides a way in which to bridge this gap. This bridging is why ModBus has a widespread appeal and hence its broad usage.

The ModBus protocol itself comes in many flavors. These varying flavors exist to facilitate the diversity in physical medium types in use across the industry.

In a generic sense the protocol uses a Client/Server architecture, where each device is assigned a unique identifier. Using this architecture, a client will typically communicate to one or more listening server devices using the unique identifier as reference. The client in this case will send ModBus requests and commands, which direct the server devices to execute a native command.

The following section will expand on the main two types of flavors that are commonly found to be in use across the industry.

 

ModBus Flavors

The ModBus protocol comes in two main variants or flavors. These flavors specifically cater to the two main types of mediums or physical communications interfaces, namely Serial or Ethernet. We will describe both in this post, however Ethernet will be our primary focus, especially when describing "The Exploits" in a later section.

1. ModBusRTU (Remote Terminal Unit)

  • This protocol/flavor is used with Serial Communications, where an RTU may be deployed and physically connected via a RS-485, RS-422 or RS-232 physically connected device.
  • Using this protocol and physical connection strategy, this caters for devices that do not possess ethernet capabilities.
  • In this protocol, direct physical connections are made either between two directly connected devices (Client/Server), or alternatively using a 'multi-drop' environment, where a RS-485 (Long range serial) connection is made between a client and subsequently daisy chained together attaching multiple server devices.
  • In this environment communications is always initiated from the client and CRC checks are conducted in order to ensure the integrity of the message flows.
  • RS-485 uses a physical DB-9 connector type.

Modbus-rs485-daisychain

ModBus Daisy Chain

Db-9

DB-9 Connector Type

2. ModBusTCP

  • This protocol/flavor is used to communicate ModBus over ethernet networks which are using TCP/IP.
  • The ModBus service typically runs over port 502/tcp in clear text.
  • Unlike the ModBusRTU variant, ModBusTCP DOES NOT utilize a CRC as this functionality is already built into the ethernet protocol itself.
  • RJ45 are the typical physical connectors used with this protocol.

Modbustcp

ModBusTCP Typical Setup

 

The Anatomy of a ModBus Frame

At a 30,000 foot view the ModBus frame or MBAP (ModBus Application Protocol Header) looks something like this:

Modbus-frame-high-level

However, a closer look at a ModBus frame appears like this:

Modbus-frame

Now, if we were to populate the frame with data it may start resembling something like this: 000000000006FF0600020f0f

Given that most of us don't speak native HEX, I have broken things down even further in a more digestible format below:

0000          0000          0006          FF          06          00020f0f

<2-byte Transaction ID>|<2-byte Protocol ID>|<2-byte length>|<1-byte Unit ID>|<1-byte function code>|<Data for response or commands>

The static portion of the frame i.e., the first seven bytes remain mostly unchanged between transactions. Where it starts to become a little more dynamic is in the last section of the frame. The section that is being referred to, in this instance, starts from the 1-byte function code onwards. This section provides the server with information about how it should respond. This response may also require the PLC to execute a low-level function e.g., switching of a relay.

The following table illustrates the available function codes. Function codes are simply commands sent from a client to a server that instruct the server to do something useful.

Function-codes

Function Codes

Referring to our example, the function code in use is '06', which as we can see is the code for the 'Write Single Holding Register' function. If we break down this specific functional code, we will understand its requirements and/or format. 

Write-single-register

Function Code ‘06’

As seen, the function code '06' uses two a 2-byte fields for its request, the first of which is the address to be written to and the second is the value that is required to be written. The first value corresponding to '0002' is the address to be written to. The second value corresponding to '0f0f' is the value that is required to be written.

A register simply refers to an address location in memory. In our case this address location will be '40002'. The reason that this value is 40002 and not 0002 is that the output holding register (the register that will be monitor for change) starts off at offset memory location '40000'. So, in our case, we have instructed address location 40002 to be populated with a two-byte value of '0f0f'.

Write-holding-base-address

Write Holding Registers

When an output holding register is changed the on-board controller, after monitoring its new value will execute upon the value found in the register. This may correspond to either a ON or OFF for example.

 

The Exploit: How such a protocol is susceptible to attack

Now that we have the theory behind us, let’s look at some of the main reasons that this type of protocol is susceptible to attack.

Some of the ModBus protocol weaknesses include:

  1. A lack of required authentication for requests
  2. A lack of encryption of traffic
  3. A lack of anti-replay defences

An attacker taking advantage of these deficiencies can chain them together ultimately leading to control of the devices. 

 

Attack Chain

  1. Sniffing of unencrypted traffic over the wire

Captured

  1. Replaying of the attack using a custom exploit to fully take-over and control the end device.

 

 

Practical Example

This particular practical example uses a ModBus enabled device. This device is used to control two physical relays, which in this instance is connected to a strobe light. This strobe light could be easily substituted for a door controller or alternatively a myriad of other potential target devices.

This example shows how an attacker can:

  • Capture a clear text ModBus command, originally destined to a target device. Through use of simply sniffing techniques.
  • Use this captured data to fully takeover the target device using a weaponized custom exploit.

 

Conclusion

The main goal for this post was to showcase the under-hood workings of what makes an OT tick. ModBus and various other protocols are often at the heart of many OT environments and as such places many ICSs at risk in terms of compromise. 

The underlying weaknesses as so described in this post, are often not considered in forethought due a number of reasons, some of which may include:

  • The “interoperability” aspect taking precedence over the “security” aspect. In this instance it may become more impactful to interrupt a functioning OT environment than to fully realize the security uplift itself.
  • The OT environment itself may consist of many legacy devices that may themselves not be upgradeable to utilize secure standards such as ‘Secure ModBus’. Secure ModBus at its core uses Ethernet as its common physical medium, TCP/IP as transport and Certificate Based Authentication to both secure traffic flows and to provide mutual authentication between server and client.
  • An organizations genuine naivety with respect to the lack of security with such a protocol.

 

References

  • Regular Penetration Testing regime: Partnering with a skilled consultancy which through regular penetration testing and assessment can provide insight into the resilience of an organizations OT environment.
  • Consider the use and potential uplifting of an OT environment towards a more secure protocol usage, such as “Secure ModBus” as described above.
  • Ensure that the facility which services the OT environment uses a defence in depth model. This infers the usage of security at each layer of the OT environments ecosystem. Some examples may include but are not limited to, the use of security appliances such as IDS’s and Firewalls and the adequate usage of physical access control systems such as to ward of internal threat actors, by limiting/restricting access to OT end systems.

 

Recommendations

Latest SpiderLabs Blogs

EDR – The Multi-Tool of Security Defenses

This is Part 8 in my ongoing project to cover 30 cybersecurity topics in 30 weekly blog posts. The full series can be found here.

Read More

The Invisible Battleground: Essentials of EASM

Know your enemy – inside and out. External Attack Surface Management tools are an effective way to understand externally facing threats and help plan cyber defenses accordingly. Let’s discuss what...

Read More

Fake Dialog Boxes to Make Malware More Convincing

Let’s explore how SpiderLabs created and incorporated user prompts, specifically Windows dialog boxes into its malware loader to make it more convincing to phishing targets during a Red Team...

Read More