CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

Services
Capture
Managed Detection & Response

Eliminate active threats with 24/7 threat detection, investigation, and response.

twi-managed-portal-color
Co-Managed SOC (SIEM)

Maximize your SIEM investment, stop alert fatigue, and enhance your team with hybrid security operations support.

twi-briefcase-color-svg
Advisory & Diagnostics

Advance your cybersecurity program and get expert guidance where you need it most.

tw-laptop-data
Penetration Testing

Test your physical locations and IT infrastructure to shore up weaknesses before exploitation.

twi-database-color-svg
Database Security

Prevent unauthorized access and exceed compliance requirements.

twi-email-color-svg
Email Security

Stop email threats others miss and secure your organization against the #1 ransomware attack vector.

tw-officer
Digital Forensics & Incident Response

Prepare for the inevitable with 24/7 global breach response in-region and available on-site.

tw-network
Firewall & Technology Management

Mitigate risk of a cyberattack with 24/7 incident and health monitoring and the latest threat intelligence.

Solutions
BY TOPIC
Offensive Security
Solutions to maximize your security ROI
Microsoft Exchange Server Attacks
Stay protected against emerging threats
Rapidly Secure New Environments
Security for rapid response situations
Securing the Cloud
Safely navigate and stay protected
Securing the IoT Landscape
Test, monitor and secure network objects
Why Trustwave
About Us
Awards and Accolades
Trustwave SpiderLabs Team
Trustwave Fusion Security Operations Platform
Trustwave Security Colony
Partners
Technology Alliance Partners
Key alliances who align and support our ecosystem of security offerings
Trustwave PartnerOne Program
Join forces with Trustwave to protect against the most advance cybersecurity threats
SpiderLabs Blog

Phishing Evolves: Rogue IVRs

As someone who's worked in the financial industry for years, I'm fascinated by methods used by phishers to encourage people to part with their money. Most of us can easily recognize and avoid the more obvious and clumsy phishing attacks (419 scams, emails in broken English claiming to be from "PayPaI," etc.), but how equipped are we do deal with the threat of rogue IVR systems?

IVR (Interactive Voice Response) is a technology that lets humans communicate with computers over a phone line, using voice recognition or touch-tones from a phone's keypad. We've all had experience with IVR systems: the automated attendants and phone menus we love to hate are implementations of IVR technology.

Your financial institution's promise to never ask for your personal information in an email doesn't really stop determined phishers; it just forces them to be more creative. That's where rogue IVR systems come in. Phishers can trick their victims into entering their personal information by emulating the legitimate IVRs of real financial institutions.

Building your own IVR is actually quite simple. Take Asterisk, for instance. Get the hardware, get the software, install and configure Asterisk on your Linux machine, and you've got yourself an IVR, ready to go. Get a cheap 800 number and you're two-thirds of the way to ruining someone's day.

The general attack model goes something like this. Using their own IVR systems, attackers send victims emails or SMS text messages nearly identical to real financial institution alerts regarding fraud detection or similar. The fake message is careful to substitute the phone number of the financial institution with the attacker's number, however. The victim calls the provided number and enters their personal information when prompted by the fake IVR.

The lazy phisher won't care how the real financial institution's IVR works; he'll just prompt the victim to enter their information but reject their credentials every time. This may net him several passwords and PINs, but it will raise red flags with victims when they realize their credentials aren't working when they should.

A somewhat more ambitious phisher will call the financial institution's real number and record the prompts and responses given by the IVR's automated system. He then uses this recorded audio to add an element of professional believability to the attack.

Now let's take a look at the most transparent (and most impressive)implementation of a rogue IVR. At DEF CON 20, this attack was demonstrated to a room full of hackers at the Social Engineering CTF. The first part of the attack is the same as above: get the victim to call your IVR by dialing your number instead of their financial institution's number. But when the call comes in, make your IVR divert the call to – wait for it – their actual financial institution! The victim will hear legitimate prompts coming from the legitimate IVR and enter his personal information – while your IVR captures that information as it plays man-in-the-middle. Unless the victim sees his financial institution's phone number later and realizes he dialed something different, he will have no idea he's been had.

The moral of this story? The only way to consistently defeat phishers and their rogue IVRs is to never dial a phone number provided in an email or SMS, even if it looks legit. Instead, save your financial institution's phone number to your contacts list and dial it from there.

Latest SpiderLabs Blogs

Fake Dialog Boxes to Make Malware More Convincing

Let’s explore how SpiderLabs created and incorporated user prompts, specifically Windows dialog boxes into its malware loader to make it more convincing to phishing targets during a Red Team...

Read More

The Secret Cipher: Modern Data Loss Prevention Solutions

This is Part 7 in my ongoing project to cover 30 cybersecurity topics in 30 weekly blog posts. The full series can be found here. Far too many organizations place Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Data...

Read More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway

Overview A command injection vulnerability has been discovered in the GlobalProtect feature within Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software for specific versions that have distinct feature configurations...

Read More