CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

Services
Capture
Managed Detection & Response

Eliminate active threats with 24/7 threat detection, investigation, and response.

twi-managed-portal-color
Co-Managed SOC (SIEM)

Maximize your SIEM investment, stop alert fatigue, and enhance your team with hybrid security operations support.

twi-briefcase-color-svg
Advisory & Diagnostics

Advance your cybersecurity program and get expert guidance where you need it most.

tw-laptop-data
Penetration Testing

Test your physical locations and IT infrastructure to shore up weaknesses before exploitation.

twi-database-color-svg
Database Security

Prevent unauthorized access and exceed compliance requirements.

twi-email-color-svg
Email Security

Stop email threats others miss and secure your organization against the #1 ransomware attack vector.

tw-officer
Digital Forensics & Incident Response

Prepare for the inevitable with 24/7 global breach response in-region and available on-site.

tw-network
Firewall & Technology Management

Mitigate risk of a cyberattack with 24/7 incident and health monitoring and the latest threat intelligence.

Solutions
BY TOPIC
Offensive Security
Solutions to maximize your security ROI
Microsoft Exchange Server Attacks
Stay protected against emerging threats
Rapidly Secure New Environments
Security for rapid response situations
Securing the Cloud
Safely navigate and stay protected
Securing the IoT Landscape
Test, monitor and secure network objects
Why Trustwave
About Us
Awards and Accolades
Trustwave SpiderLabs Team
Trustwave Fusion Security Operations Platform
Trustwave Security Colony
Partners
Technology Alliance Partners
Key alliances who align and support our ecosystem of security offerings
Trustwave PartnerOne Program
Join forces with Trustwave to protect against the most advance cybersecurity threats
SpiderLabs Blog

Update from Trustwave SpiderLabs EMEA, London

It was a hectic week in London. In case you hadn't heard its was InfoSec Europe week, but we were also busy with the SC Awards dinner (where PenTest Manager won the innovation award), Besides London, 44 café, speaking at InfoSec in the conference track, and speaking at an insurance event.

We also managed to find time to host a private customer networking lunch inside the InfoSec venue where we encouraged security and risk managers from our customer base to share their experiences and insights under chatham house rules on a number of hot topics in security. We discussed technology outsourcing risks, security awareness and education of employees amongst others. (we run these types of "sharing security insights" dinners on a semi-regular basis so if you'd like to attend one, let us know)

Insurance conventions and EU draft regulations… you might not normally associate SpiderLabs with either, but read on…

Our Global Security Report 2012 shows that data breach victims are largely unable to self-detect data compromises (only 16% of organisations self-detected they had suffered a breach according to our statistics) and also that the time lag between intrusion and detection can be very lengthy (some of the 2011 cases we worked, the initial point of intrusion dated back to 2008 and 2009).

This throws up some interesting considerations for the "cyber risk insurance" industry. Which was the subject of our joint presentation with DAC Beachcroft LLP at the International Association of Claims Professionals (www.iaclpro.com). Our insights raised a number of eye-brows, and generated lots of interesting questions around how cyber insurance products might need to be improved to reflect these realities. (we will be working on a follow up blog post to cover some of these off).

Some of the stats discussed above also have implications when considering the EU draft data protection regulation which will amongst other things, legally compel breached organisations throughout the EU to notify the local data protection agency, as well as the affected persons. Trustwave SpiderLabs EMEA Director, John Yeo received some press coverage on this subject in a recent Financial Times article (http://on.ft.com/IiIcbV, free registration required).

As the proposed regulation is not yet law, there will undoubtedly be some changes yet to come. However astute organisations are already starting to think about what they will need to do better to not get caught out by its introduction.

Conversely, not being able to understand what malicious/suspicious activities are occurring within your IT environment probably isn't a great starting point from a due-diligence perspective, but we know from the low data-breach self-detection rates this is the reality for many organizations…

Latest SpiderLabs Blogs

EDR – The Multi-Tool of Security Defenses

This is Part 8 in my ongoing project to cover 30 cybersecurity topics in 30 weekly blog posts. The full series can be found here.

Read More

The Invisible Battleground: Essentials of EASM

Know your enemy – inside and out. External Attack Surface Management tools are an effective way to understand externally facing threats and help plan cyber defenses accordingly. Let’s discuss what...

Read More

Fake Dialog Boxes to Make Malware More Convincing

Let’s explore how SpiderLabs created and incorporated user prompts, specifically Windows dialog boxes into its malware loader to make it more convincing to phishing targets during a Red Team...

Read More