CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

Managed Detection & Response

Eliminate active threats with 24/7 threat detection, investigation, and response.

Co-Managed SOC (SIEM)

Maximize your SIEM investment, stop alert fatigue, and enhance your team with hybrid security operations support.

Advisory & Diagnostics

Advance your cybersecurity program and get expert guidance where you need it most.

Penetration Testing

Test your physical locations and IT infrastructure to shore up weaknesses before exploitation.

Database Security

Prevent unauthorized access and exceed compliance requirements.

Email Security

Stop email threats others miss and secure your organization against the #1 ransomware attack vector.

Digital Forensics & Incident Response

Prepare for the inevitable with 24/7 global breach response in-region and available on-site.

Firewall & Technology Management

Mitigate risk of a cyberattack with 24/7 incident and health monitoring and the latest threat intelligence.

Offensive Security
Solutions to maximize your security ROI
Microsoft Exchange Server Attacks
Stay protected against emerging threats
Rapidly Secure New Environments
Security for rapid response situations
Securing the Cloud
Safely navigate and stay protected
Securing the IoT Landscape
Test, monitor and secure network objects
Why Trustwave
About Us
Awards and Accolades
Trustwave SpiderLabs Team
Trustwave Fusion Security Operations Platform
Trustwave Security Colony
Technology Alliance Partners
Key alliances who align and support our ecosystem of security offerings
Trustwave PartnerOne Program
Join forces with Trustwave to protect against the most advance cybersecurity threats

Q&A: Can VENOM Take a Bite Out of Your Data Center?

Security researchers have uncovered a potentially major vulnerability, which they named VENOM, that affects virtual machines. IT departments, particularly those housed in environments that use a lot of virtualization, are scrambling to understand the ramifications of this new threat.

We asked Trustwave Threat Intelligence Manager Karl Sigler to explain how the bug operates, what risk it poses to organizations and whether it rivals a certain high-profile vulnerability from 2014.

Q: We're adding a new "celebrity" vulnerability to the list with the discovery of the frightful-sounding VENOM. What's it all about?

A: VENOM (Virtualized Environment Neglected Operations Manipulation) is a new vulnerability that affects virtual environments that allow you to run multiple virtual systems on a single "bare metal" machine. The vulnerability can be exploited to allow the attacker to "break out" of their virtual machine and access the "bare metal" machine, a.k.a. the underlying hypervisor or any other of the virtual machines running on the system. This specific vulnerability is in QEMU's (an open-source hypervisor) code for virtual floppy drives. This code is reused in many different open-source virtualization platforms like Xen and KVM. Microsoft Hyper-V and VMWare virtualization solutions, however, are not vulnerable.

Q: What makes this vulnerability unique?

A: These types of vulnerabilities are known as "virtual machine (VM) escape" vulnerabilities, and we've seen similar bugs in the past. VENOM, however, affects a wider list of virtualization platforms and can lead to arbitrary code execution even with default configurations. As far as VM escape vulnerabilities go, this is probably as bad as we've seen.

Q: What could be the consequences?

A: It's dependent on what data is available on the virtual machines to which the attacker gains unauthorized access. Any attacker would potentially have full system access on every virtual machine on the same hypervisor. The more valuable the systems, the more critical the breach. For instance, if a virtual machine was hosting an e-commerce website, an attacker could steal credit card numbers from the backend database, manipulate prices or infect visitors with malware. But if the virtual system were simply a forgotten test box never used in production, they wouldn't get as much of a payday.

Q: The vulnerability has been compared to Heartbleed. Is it a worthy comparison?

A: No, and I say that for a couple of reasons. While Heartbleed can be exploited remotely with anonymous access, VENOM can only be exploited if you have access to an existing virtual machine. In this sense, it works very much like a privilege escalation attack. This limits the severity a bit. Also while VENOM does affect the popular virtualization platforms of XEN, KVM, QEMU and VirtualBox, the absence of VMWare and Microsoft Hyper-V as affected technology eases the blow for a lot of virtualization deployments.

Q: How might attackers leverage this vulnerability to cause harm and who is most at risk?

A: I would see this attack typically used to target hosting companies that use virtual environments like KVM. An attacker would purchase a cheap virtual private server instance, and then use VENOM to breach the hosting machine.

Q: Has anyone been attacked "in the wild" through a VENOM exploit?

A: No, there have been no attacks seen in the wild and there is currently no "proof of concept" or exploit. Hopefully, this will give administrators some breathing space to apply a patch.

Q: So that means businesses can protect themselves from VENOM?

A: There is a patch available for most of the affected platforms. Admins should check with their specific virtualization vendor. Businesses should also be applying some basic best practices. Since virtual machines are often used for testing purposes - and then forgotten about once that testing is complete - the idea of virtual server "sprawl" introduces unnecessary risk to the network. Conducting regular vulnerability inventory scans can often flag virtual systems that you didn't even know had been deployed.

It's also very important to remember that virtual environments typically are heterogeneous. You must keep a proper inventory of virtual machines and segment them from each other based on value and risk. This would help mitigate any damage that might occur if those systems are breached.

Latest Trustwave Blogs

Trustwave, Telarus Announce Strategic Global Partnership

Trustwave is partnering with Telarus, a leading technology services distributor (TSD), which will allow it to leverage Trustwave’s comprehensive offensive and defensive cybersecurity portfolio and...

Read More

Unlocking the Power of Offensive Security: Trustwave's Proactive Approach to Cyber Defense

Clients often conflate Offensive Security with penetration testing, yet they serve distinct purposes within cybersecurity. Offensive Security is a broad term encompassing strategies to protect...

Read More

Behind the Scenes of the Change Healthcare Ransomware Attack Cyber Gang Dispute

Editor’s Note – The situation with the Change Healthcare cyberattack is changing frequently. The information in this blog is current as of April 16. We will update the blog as needed. April 16, 2024:...

Read More