CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

CVE-2024-3400: PAN-OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect Gateway. Learn More

Services
Capture
Managed Detection & Response

Eliminate active threats with 24/7 threat detection, investigation, and response.

twi-managed-portal-color
Co-Managed SOC (SIEM)

Maximize your SIEM investment, stop alert fatigue, and enhance your team with hybrid security operations support.

twi-briefcase-color-svg
Advisory & Diagnostics

Advance your cybersecurity program and get expert guidance where you need it most.

tw-laptop-data
Penetration Testing

Test your physical locations and IT infrastructure to shore up weaknesses before exploitation.

twi-database-color-svg
Database Security

Prevent unauthorized access and exceed compliance requirements.

twi-email-color-svg
Email Security

Stop email threats others miss and secure your organization against the #1 ransomware attack vector.

tw-officer
Digital Forensics & Incident Response

Prepare for the inevitable with 24/7 global breach response in-region and available on-site.

tw-network
Firewall & Technology Management

Mitigate risk of a cyberattack with 24/7 incident and health monitoring and the latest threat intelligence.

Solutions
BY TOPIC
Microsoft Exchange Server Attacks
Stay protected against emerging threats
Rapidly Secure New Environments
Security for rapid response situations
Securing the Cloud
Safely navigate and stay protected
Securing the IoT Landscape
Test, monitor and secure network objects
Why Trustwave
About Us
Awards and Accolades
Trustwave SpiderLabs Team
Trustwave Fusion Security Operations Platform
Trustwave Security Colony
Partners
Technology Alliance Partners
Key alliances who align and support our ecosystem of security offerings
Trustwave PartnerOne Program
Join forces with Trustwave to protect against the most advance cybersecurity threats

Redefining Baselining and Tuning for Modern Threat Detection and Response

In cybersecurity, it can be said that the only constant is change. Every year, the pace of technological development is matched only by the relentless emergence of new and ever-shifting threats—creating an imperative for techniques and practices to evolve as well.

Historically, baselining and tuning was used by cybersecurity practitioners to configure tools and the actions of managed security service providers (MSSPs) to help organizations generate the appropriate alerts and actions. But, just as the cybersecurity industry is generally shifting towards more of a managed detection and response (MDR) model, these tried and true practices also need to change.

How can baselining and tuning evolve to fit the current MDR model? To find out, we talked with Kory Daniels Global Director, Threat Detection & Response Consulting at Trustwave.

The Traditional Approach

The traditional mindset behind baselining and tuning is that cybersecurity teams would feed their technology, or their cybersecurity vendors, data – in the hopes of generating the alerts that they needed. In other words, they followed a data first approach. This led to a situation where organizations were not fully understanding the baselining and tuning process – in particular, not fully understanding the length of time that was necessary to successfully complete the baselining process and how that led into “live” mode, where you have a high fidelity view of your operational state.

“Many organizations over the years, from a combination of immature tooling and an immature framework and methodology regarding the baselining and tuning processes, unfortunately wound up in a kind of state of indefinite baselining,“ Kory said. “They never really reach the quality of alerts that they need to aid in their investigations, and to understand how they can take the appropriate actions in regard to the risks to their business."

This has been a challenge for organizations, in part because it costs time and money, but also because some organizations never arrive at the level of security maturity that they need. The difference between organizations that did baselining and tuning well, versus those that didn’t, tracks back to a strong methodology that almost turned the process on it heads by taking a threat-first approach.  

Redefining the Process

A threat-first approach to modern baselining and tuning allows organizations to be more tactically prescriptive, as they work proactively to select the data that drives the right actions for their business. This also allows them to determine how to manage that data over time, since they can start with external data, move to internal data, and then to additional data types in the ecosystem (like cloud data). By taking a phased approach, you can document as you go and be prescriptive about where you want your focus to be.  

“In the modern era, baselining and tuning should really be about what use cases and threats we are going to mitigate,” Kory said. “So, the new modern approach to baselining and tuning is really about shortening your success criteria. That’s the shift taking place right now – from a data-based approach to a threat-based approach. Data types have grown exponentially over recent years – so the old approach simply isn’t feasible anymore.”

Now, organizations are best served by starting with the threats – and the use cases – that you want to be able to detect and investigate. Add on to that the use cases of how your organizations will investigate and respond when an alert goes off, and that will then drive the data that you need so you’ll have a clearer picture of what baselining and tuning you’ll need to do for the outcomes that you need.   

“Organizations used to start big,” Kory said. “The traditional method was to start with a big data set, then prune it down to find the actionable intelligence. But that’s expensive. In the modern era, a threat driven approach allows you to start small—and focused—and then add on to it. So, you can always focus on the things that are important to your business.”

Latest Trustwave Blogs

Law Enforcement Must Keep up the Pressure on Cybergangs

The (apparent) takedown of major ransomware players like Blackcat/ALPHV and LockBit and the threat groups’ (apparent) revival is a prime example of the Whack-a-Mole nature of combating ransomware...

Read More

Effective Cybersecurity Incident Response: What to Expect from Your MDR Provider

Companies engage with a managed detection and response (MDR) provider to help ensure they detect cyber threats before they do any damage. The "response" part of the MDR moniker is key to that effort,...

Read More

The Power of Red and Purple Team Drills in Enhancing Offensive Security Programs

Despite investing in costly security solutions, keeping up with patches, and educating employees about suspicious emails, breaches still occur, leaving many organizations to wonder why they are...

Read More